From Mercedes to BYD: The Full Story of Power Shifts in the Global Automotive Industry

For decades, the automotive sector has been the industrial backbone of the European Union, employing roughly 13.8 million people—8.1% of the bloc’s manufacturing jobs—generating close to 7% of its GDP and a trade surplus exceeding €79.5 billion. Yet this entrenched primacy is now exposed. The legislated phase-out of the internal combustion engine (ICE) by 2035, structurally elevated energy costs, and China’s state-backed scaling of new energy vehicles (NEVs) have converged to erode advantages built over a century. Within a single decade, China has vaulted from an assembler of imported technology to the global pacesetter in battery chemistry, critical-mineral refining, and software-defined vehicle production.

Accordingly, this analysis aims to provide a rigorous quantitative assessment of Europe’s eroding automotive competitiveness against China’s ascent, across three interlocking axes: the empirical evidence of the market shift, the financial and economic root causes, and the strategic outlook for a continent now forced onto the defensive.

The redistribution of automotive market share is no longer a hypothetical scenario but a statistically verifiable reality that has crystallised over the past decade. German car production, which peaked at 5.74 million units in 2016, is projected by the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) to fall to 4.11 million by 2026—a structural contraction approaching 28%. China moved in the opposite direction: its electric-vehicle market expanded by more than 12.5 million units between 2020 and 2025, growing more than fivefold the European pace, while total output reached a record 27 million vehicles in 2024, vaulting the country into the position of the world’s largest car exporter.

The imbalance is sharpest within Europe’s own market. In May 2026, total new-car registrations across the EU rose a modest 4% year on year, even as registrations of Chinese-branded vehicles surged 111%, capturing 5.9% of sales across 28 European markets. Individual marques posted extraordinary momentum—Leapmotor near 447%, Chery near 240%, and BYD near 159%—while petrol-car registrations fell 18.2%, with steep declines in historic manufacturing markets such as France, Spain, Germany, and Italy.

The engine of this rapid penetration is a deeply entrenched cost advantage. A UBS Evidence Lab teardown of the BYD Seal concluded that the vehicle is 35% cheaper to build than comparable European EVs, propelled by vertical integration that keeps roughly 75% of its components in-house. European battery cells, in turn, cost nearly twice as much to produce as their Chinese counterparts—some 90% more—while the median European EV retails near €51,000, a formidable affordability barrier. The trade balance has inverted accordingly: the value of EU car imports from China rose 1,591% between 2019 and 2024, and by early 2025 the Union recorded its first bilateral automotive trade deficit with China in modern industrial history.

This advantage is insulated behind near-monopolistic control of the battery supply chain. China commands more than 80% of global cell production, roughly 85% of cathode active material and 90% of anode material, and exceeds 98% of the lower-cost lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) chain. Export has shifted from luxury to leverage: Beijing lifted the export share of its output from 3% in 2019 to 20% in 2024, even as the Chinese market now absorbs 21% of EU export-oriented value added—doubling the continent’s exposure to a single market’s fluctuations and to its potential weaponization.

The same divergence is mirrored in financial performance, where operating margins at Europe’s flagship automakers have collapsed within two years, as the following figure shows.

 
<div style=”min-height:213px” id=”datawrapper-vis-5V1wI”><script type=”text/javascript” defer src=”https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/5V1wI/embed.js” charset=”utf-8″ data-target=”#datawrapper-vis-5V1wI”></script><noscript><img src=”https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/5V1wI/full.png” alt=”Table” /></noscript></div>
 

These figures lay bare the depth of the crisis: Stellantis posted a net loss of €22.3 billion in 2025, while Volkswagen’s operating profit fell 53%, leaving a margin of just 2.8%. China’s leading private manufacturers, by contrast, booked combined net profits near 31.14 billion yuan in the first half of 2025 despite a punishing domestic price war—so much so that BYD’s market capitalization alone now eclipses the combined valuations of Europe’s premier automotive groups, a stark verdict on investor confidence in the legacy industry’s ability to navigate electrification profitably.

This decline rests on intertwined financial and structural causes rather than on product strategy alone. China’s expansion is underwritten by multi-layered state support that private European capital markets cannot match. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy estimates Chinese industrial subsidies at three to nine times the OECD norm—about €221 billion in 2019 alone—while BYD received €3.4 billion in direct subsidies between 2018 and 2022, alongside an opaque lattice of indirect support spanning subsidised inputs, preferential state-bank financing, and procurement directives favouring domestic brands.

Direct transfers tell only part of the story. Domestic-content rules introduced in 2016 restricted purchase incentives to batteries from an approved roster of local suppliers, engineering a “learning-by-doing” loop that, by National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) estimates, cut Chinese battery-manufacturing costs by 42% over seven years—far outpacing the 34% gains delivered by general technological upgrading and cementing a cumulative lead that is difficult to close.

European incumbents face the mirror image: a dual capital-expenditure squeeze. The 2035 combustion ban compels them to sustain legacy platforms to maintain cash flow while simultaneously pouring tens of billions into unproven EV architectures, battery chemistries, and software stacks. Past regulatory missteps have compounded the burden—what Volkswagen paid for the 2015 diesel-emissions scandal in the United States alone exceeded BYD’s entire research-and-development outlay across the 2016–2025 decade—so that electrification effectively discards a century of accumulated European expertise in combustion engineering.

These burdens compound with elevated industrial energy costs in the wake of the 2022 severing of cheap Russian gas, leaving EU industrial electricity prices roughly 90% above China’s and double those of the United States. Labour economics impose a still deeper structural barrier, as the following figure on estimated labour cost per vehicle by region illustrates.

The gap reveals that German labour costs run roughly 5.6 times their Chinese equivalent—a chasm no marginal efficiency can bridge. The strain deepens as European plant utilisation falls to 54% in the west of the continent, well below the 70% profitability threshold, with Volkswagen’s Osnabrück plant operating at just 30% capacity. To this is added Europe’s delayed pivot to the software-defined vehicle (SDV): BYD offers assisted-driving systems for under $411, against roughly $2,800 in the legacy industry, eroding the European product’s edge on price and digital experience alike.

Layered atop these pressures is a structural exposure in the semiconductor industry. Despite the European Chips Act and its €31.5 billion in commitments, European production lines remain dependent on imported power chips—at a moment when Beijing has demonstrated its willingness to weaponise the supply chain through export controls on critical minerals such as gallium and germanium, both indispensable to modern automotive electronics and motor magnets.

Confronting this imbalance, the European industry is shifting from an era of global expansion to one of defensive, regional consolidation. In late 2024 the European Commission imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric vehicles, levied on top of the standard 10% import duty and calibrated by manufacturer, as the following figure details.

Yet the efficacy of these duties is already eroding through regulatory loopholes and agile pricing. Chinese makers swiftly pivoted exports toward plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), initially exempt from countervailing duties, prompting the Commission to draft measures to close the gap by mid-2026. Beijing has retaliated in kind—imposing provisional duties of up to 42.7% on European dairy and conducting disruptive probes into pork and brandy—while a “green paradox” means that protectionism raises the consumer cost of the green transition and slows the Union’s path toward its 2030 climate target.

In parallel, Chinese firms are accelerating the localisation of production inside Europe to leap the tariff wall, with marques such as Geely and Leapmotor absorbing the distressed plants of their European rivals. The result is a pointed geopolitical paradox: to preserve domestic manufacturing jobs, European entities must increasingly partner with the very competitors displacing them—precisely as the proposed European Industrial Accelerator Act seeks to constrain such investment with stringent conditions, requiring local European workers to constitute at least 50% of staff, capping Chinese ownership at 49%, and mandating local licensing of know-how—terms that may deter capital outright or prove unworkable given Europe’s negligible critical-mineral refining capacity.

These forces converge on a permanent structural shift in the industry’s identity, along three parallel tracks: Europe’s reduction to a low-value assembly hub reliant on Chinese components and intellectual property, while the high-value technological core remains imported; a retreat of legacy marques into luxury niches, where Germany already produces 83% of the continent’s premium vehicles; and a hollowing of foreign direct investment, which collapsed from over €7.7 billion in 2022 to a mere €218 million in the first half of 2025—even as European outbound FDI fell from €11 billion in 2023 to €341 million in 2025 and China’s share of global outbound flows climbed to 49%.

In sum, the European sector faces a structural contraction that will be difficult to reverse without a radical recalibration of its energy, labour, and subsidy equations. On current trajectories, Chinese marques are likely to breach the 10% share threshold in the European market by 2028 should their present growth persist, while German output is set to contract below 3.8 million vehicles by 2030 as the retreat into luxury hardens. The Union’s automotive trade deficit with China, in turn, will most likely continue to widen unless the hybrid loophole is closed and the countervailing duties are implemented, thereby turning Europe’s historic industrial leadership into a subordinate position within a value chain whose upper links Beijing controls.

WifiTalents. 2026. “Europe Automotive Industry Statistics | 2026 Edition.” WifiTalents. Accessed June 24, 2026. https://wifitalents.com/europe-automotive-industry-statistics/.

VDA. 2026. “Automobile Production.” Verband der Automobilindustrie. Accessed June 24, 2026. https://www.vda.de/en/news/facts-and-figures/annual-figures/automobile-production.

International Energy Agency. 2026. “The Global Car Industry in Context.” IEA. Accessed June 24, 2026. https://www.iea.org/reports/what-next-for-the-global-car-industry/the-global-car-industry-in-context.

JATO Dynamics. 2026. “Chinese Automakers Double European Market Share in May.” JATO. Accessed June 23, 2026. https://www.jato.com/resources/media-and-press-releases/chinese-automakers-double-european-market-share-in-may.

Global Times. 2026. “Chinese Automakers See Rising Sales in Europe in May, Led by EV Shipments.” Global Times, June 2026. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202606/1364229.shtml.

Yicai Global. 2023. “BYD Seal Has 35% Cost Edge over European EVs, UBS Report Says.” Yicai Global. Accessed June 22, 2026. https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/chinas-byd-seal-has-25-cost-advantage-over-european-north-american-evs-ubs-report-shows.

Transport & Environment. 2026. “The Falling Cost Gap between EU and Chinese Batteries.” T&E Briefing, March 2026. https://uploads.transportenvironment.org/production/files/2026_03_Briefing_IAA_battery_costs.pdf.

Allianz. 2023. “The Chinese Challenge to the European Automotive Industry.” Allianz Economic Research, May 9, 2023. https://www.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/azcom/Allianz_com/economic-research/publications/specials/en/2023/may/2023-05-09-Automobile.pdf.

Eurostat. 2026. “EU Trade with China – Latest Developments.” Statistics Explained. Accessed June 21, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EU_trade_with_China_-_latest_developments.

Macrotrends. 2026. “Mercedes-Benz Group AG EBIT Margin 2012–2025.” Macrotrends. Accessed June 24, 2026. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MBGYY/mercedes-benz-group-ag/ebit-margin.

Stellantis. 2026. “Full Year 2025 Results.” Stellantis, February 2026. https://www.stellantis.com/en/news/press-releases/2026/february/full-year-2025-results.

36Kr. 2025. “In the First Half of the Year, the Net Profit of BYD + Geely + Great Wall ≈ CATL.” 36Kr. Accessed June 22, 2026. https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3449427829593734.

Capital.com. 2026. “Largest Car Companies by Market Cap 2026.” Capital.com. Accessed June 23, 2026. https://capital.com/en-int/markets/shares/largest-car-companies-by-market-cap.

Kiel Institute for the World Economy. 2024. “Foul Play? On the Scale and Scope of Industrial Subsidies in China.” Kiel Institute. Accessed June 22, 2026. https://www.kielinstitut.de/publications/foul-play-on-the-scale-and-scope-of-industrial-subsidies-in-china-17562/.

CLEPA. 2026. “Industry under Pressure: Europe’s Shrinking Global Role.” European Association of Automotive Suppliers. Accessed June 23, 2026. https://www.clepa.eu/insights-updates/data-digests/industry-under-pressure-europes-shrinking-global-role/.

Oliver Wyman. 2025. “Why Automakers Need to Focus on Labor Cost per Vehicle.” Oliver Wyman, April 2025. https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2025/apr/why-automakers-must-focus-on-labor-cost-per-vehicle.html.

Institute for Energy Research. 2026. “Many of Europe’s Car Factories Are Underutilized.” IER. Accessed June 22, 2026. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/fossil-fuels/gas-and-oil/many-of-europes-car-factories-are-underutilized/.

TechNode. 2023. “BYD Production Costs in EU Could Be 25% Lower than Rivals: UBS.” TechNode, September 6, 2023. https://technode.com/2023/09/06/byds-manufacturing-costs-in-eu-could-be-25-lower-than-rivals-ubs/.

Electrive. 2026. “EU Plans Additional Tariffs on Chinese PHEVs.” Electrive, June 19, 2026. https://www.electrive.com/2026/06/19/eu-plans-additional-tariffs-on-chinese-phevs/.

The Guardian. 2025. “China Hits EU Dairy Industry with Tariffs of up to 42.7%.” The Guardian, December 22, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/dec/22/china-hits-eu-dairy-industry-with-tariffs.

European Council on Foreign Relations. 2026. “Electric Shock: The Chinese Threat to Europe’s Industrial Heartland.” ECFR. Accessed June 24, 2026. https://ecfr.eu/publication/electric-shock-the-chinese-threat-to-europes-industrial-heartland/.