The Collapse of the Western Flank: The Implications of Maduro’s Fall for Iran

Operation Absolute Resolve, which resulted in the removal of Nicolás Maduro and his spouse Cilia Flores on Jan. 3, 2026, constituted a watershed moment in the history of 21st-century geopolitical warfare. While initial indicators point to a seemingly limited regime change within Venezuela, the strategic repercussions of the operation inflicted severe damage on Iran’s forward-operating capabilities. For nearly two decades, Venezuela was not merely a diplomatic partner of Tehran; it served as an indispensable logistical bridgehead and a secure sanctuary in the Western Hemisphere. Through this platform, the Iranian regime was able to circumvent international sanctions, project asymmetric influence, and sustain a critical financial lifeline through illicit trade.

The roots of the strategic partnership between Iran and Venezuela date back to the early 2000s, when Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad established what they described as a strategic alliance grounded in shared opposition to U.S. hegemony. This relationship provided Tehran with a strategic foothold inside the American sphere of influence in the Western Hemisphere, while enabling Venezuela to draw on Iranian technical and financial support to mitigate international isolation and mounting domestic economic and political crises.

Bilateral cooperation expanded markedly following Nicolás Maduro’s rise to power in 2013 and culminated in the signing of a comprehensive 20-year agreement in 2022. The agreement encompassed the oil, petrochemicals, defence, and infrastructure sectors, formally institutionalising sanctions-circumvention mechanisms across critical domains, which can be delineated as follows:

Economic and Financial Dimensions

Over the course of two decades, Iranian investments in Venezuela reached substantial levels, with total financial commitments estimated at approximately $7.82 billion. Of this amount, $4.69 billion was allocated to direct projects and investments, while $3.13 billion was channelled through indirect Chinese–Venezuelan financial channels. These investments were concentrated primarily in the energy sector, banking cooperation, and logistical networks.

Iran also leveraged Venezuela as a platform to access broader Latin American markets, establishing shell companies and financial conduits that supported not only bilateral trade but also Tehran’s wider global commercial activities. To circumvent international financial restrictions, both sides developed trade channels operating outside the formal banking system, relying on barter arrangements, cash payments, and opaque settlement networks.

Oil exports were managed through a network of intermediaries and shell companies linked to the IRGC and Hezbollah, thereby concealing the origins of shipments and revenue streams. Gold, meanwhile, emerged as a principal settlement instrument for payments for Iranian goods and services. This included Venezuela’s transfer of approximately 9 tons of gold to Tehran in 2020 in exchange for fuel supplies.

In this context, Tehran provided support to Caracas in establishing parallel banking networks designed to bypass the SWIFT system, utilising crypto assets and shell companies to move funds. This arrangement entrenched Venezuela’s role as a strategic hub that enabled Iran to circumvent key points of U.S. financial pressure.

Cooperation also extended to the launch of joint projects, including automobile assembly plants initiated in 2007 and housing developments comprising approximately 23,000 units. These projects were leveraged to generate hard-currency revenues and facilitate the settlement of intra-network financial transactions.

Cooperation in Oil and Energy Infrastructure

By the time Iran deepened its engagement in the third decade of the 21st-century, Venezuela’s oil sector had deteriorated catastrophically and years of underinvestment, talent outflows, mismanagement, and U.S. sanctions had driven Venezuelan production down from more than 3million barrels per day to less than 1million.

Against this backdrop, Iran entrenched itself as a critical lifeline for Venezuela through expansive oil-for-fuel exchange agreements. Beginning in 2020, Iran dispatched multiple tankers carrying gasoline, condensates, and other refining components to alleviate Venezuela’s acute fuel shortages, in return for basic commodities such as crude oil and, at times, gold, a barter arrangement both governments defended as legitimate trade under sanctions.

Iran also regularly supplied Venezuela with condensates to dilute the country’s ultra-heavy crude, thereby making it marketable, in exchange for heavy Venezuelan crude. These swap arrangements enabled both sanctioned states to sustain oil flows. By 2022–2023, Iran was sending more than 40,000 barrels per day of crude oil and condensates to Venezuela, even as Caracas reciprocated with comparable volumes of its own crude and refined products in return.

This cooperation extended beyond emergency fuel shipments during periods of acute shortages. It extended to the provision of technical expertise, equipment, and operational know-how necessary to sustain core refining operations. Iranian firms undertook comprehensive refinery rehabilitation projects, with the National Iranian Oil Engineering and Construction Company (NIOEC), affiliated with the IRGC, securing contracts worth approximately 110 million euros to refurbish Venezuelan oil refineries.

These efforts included the overhaul of the El Palito Refinery in 2023, as well as work at the vast Paraguaná Refining Centre (CRP), the country’s principal refining hub, with a nominal capacity approaching 1 million barrels per day.

Although these projects never achieved their stated objectives, plagued as they were by recurrent power outages, shortages of feedstock, and chronic inefficiencies, they nonetheless provided Iran with valuable operational experience in managing sanctions-constrained oil infrastructure. They created dependency structures that reinforced Tehran’s leverage in Caracas.

At another level, energy cooperation served two strategic purposes for Iran. First, it generated revenue streams and secured access to crude oil supplies that could be redirected to Chinese buyers through payment structures specifically designed to circumvent Western financial sanctions. Second, these projects established precedents for similar arrangements pursued by Tehran elsewhere, including in Syria, thereby developing a replicable sanctions-evasion model. This framework has helped sustain Iranian oil exports at an estimated 1.5 to 2 million barrels per day despite ongoing international restrictions.

Military and Security Cooperation

The military dimension of Iranian–Venezuelan cooperation arguably constituted the most strategically sensitive pillar of their relationship. It effectively transformed Venezuela into what Israeli and U.S. officials have described as an “advanced Iranian forward operating base in Latin America.” This cooperation unfolded across multiple layers, including weapons transfers, training programmes, intelligence sharing, and the establishment of production facilities for Iranian military equipment on Venezuelan territory.

In December 2025, just days before the U.S. operation against Maduro, the Venezuelan military formally activated Iranian Mohajer-6 armed drones, systems similar to those Iran and Russia have deployed extensively in Ukraine.

Israeli intelligence assessments warned that elements of the IRGC stationed in Venezuela could target U.S. assets or maritime traffic in the Caribbean, or potentially conduct operations on U.S. territory using Venezuelan infrastructure. In response, the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on Venezuelan companies and officials involved in the procurement of Iranian drones, identifying a firm based in Palo Negro and its chairman as key facilitators of this military relationship.

Beyond the transfer of military hardware, Iran embedded advisers from the IRGC within Venezuelan security institutions, providing training, operational guidance, and intelligence support to the Nicolás Maduro regime.

This military presence served Tehran’s broader strategic objectives: demonstrating its ability to project power in proximity to U.S. territory, complicating Washington’s security calculations, and creating potential asymmetric options should Iran face military pressure in the Middle East.

Venezuela evolved from a mere purchaser of Iranian weaponry into a production partner, assembling advanced unmanned aerial systems capable of threatening U.S. interests in the Caribbean. This shift was facilitated through Empresa Aeronáutica Nacional, S.A. (EANSA), a Venezuelan state-owned aerospace company that operated as a front for Qods Aviation Industries (QAI), the primary manufacturer of drones for the IRGC.

In parallel, EANSA oversaw the assembly of drones valued at millions of dollars, using knock-down kits shipped from Iran via sanctioned cargo vessels and flights operated by Mahan Air. The hub of this programme was El Libertador Air Base (BAEL) in Maracay, Aragua. Owing to its proximity to the Caribbean coast, the base offered an ideal platform for reconnaissance and strike missions targeting U.S. naval movements under United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).

The facility hosted Iranian engineers and advisers from the IRGC, who supervised the assembly, maintenance, and doctrinal integration of these systems into the Venezuelan armed forces. For Tehran, this partnership was not a routine commercial arrangement but a strategic mechanism for weapons deployment, designed to circumvent United Nations restrictions on missile technology and to establish a production base outside the Middle East.

The collapse of the Maduro regime constituted a severe blow to Tehran, abruptly severing critical revenue streams and contractual arrangements overnight. It also triggered a state of strategic disruption for Iran, the principal dimensions of which can be outlined as follows:

The Immediate Economic Impact on Iran

Maduro’s removal constituted a sharp economic setback for Iran, coinciding with what is widely regarded as its most severe financial crisis in decades. The national currency depreciated to unprecedented levels, trading at around 1.47 million rials per U.S. dollar by early January 2026, reflecting an approximate 40% decline since the confrontation with Israel in June 2025. This collapse was accompanied by surging inflation, estimated at 42 to 48%, which eroded purchasing power and fuelled widespread popular unrest. Protests reportedly erupted in more than 88 cities across 27 of Iran’s 31 provinces.

Against this backdrop, the loss of Iranian investments in Venezuela, estimated at between $4.7 billion and $7.8 billion, delivered a crippling blow. Particularly damaging was the prospect that outstanding debts exceeding $2 billion may now prove unrecoverable, a scenario that closely mirrors the losses Iran incurred in Syria following the erosion of Bashar al-Assad’s influence.

At the procedural level, the head of the Iran–China Joint Chamber of Commerce announced on Jan. 4, 2026, that Iranian funds were being withdrawn from Venezuela, signalling pre-emptive risk hedging by Iran. Nevertheless, fixed assets, such as refineries and critical infrastructure, remain vulnerable to the risks of seizure or nationalisation, or to debt-restructuring processes involving Western creditors, developments that would inevitably exclude sanctioned Iranian entities.

The damage extends well beyond immediate financial losses. Under U.S. pressure, Venezuela’s interim government has signalled its willingness to unwind economic ties with Iran, China, Russia, and Cuba, while confining future oil-sector cooperation to the U.S. This shift not only deprives Tehran of a critical sanctions-evasion platform but also threatens to dismantle a vital segment of its global financial network.

The new authorities are expected to freeze any gold-transfer operations, severing a vital source of foreign currency for Iran, for which gold had served as an effective instrument to bypass banking sanctions. This move represents a strategic loss in light of Tehran’s acute shortage of foreign exchange reserves, as it had relied on Venezuelan gold as an off-books financial resource, most notably in 2020, when it received shipments valued at hundreds of millions of dollars from Venezuela.

As the U.S. administration moves to assert oversight of Venezuela’s oil sector and involve American companies in its rehabilitation, Iran’s technical presence has become untenable. The expulsion of Iranian technical teams and the termination of existing contracts, including the critical El Palito Refinery project, now appear inevitable.

This development signals the collapse of Iran’s ambitions to establish a foothold in the refining sector across the Americas and entails the loss of outstanding payments for prior work, leaving Iranian firms facing realised losses. The transitional government in Caracas will not continue importing Iranian fuel or engaging in sanctions-violating barter arrangements, depriving Iranian oil tankers of their safe harbour and cutting off key outlets for crude oil and condensates. This shift will compel Iran to seek alternative markets under conditions that are likely to be less economically viable and carry a higher risk.

Iranian analysts and officials have warned that the collapse of Tehran’s “western flank” would dismantle a critical node in its sanctions-evasion network, an outcome that is now materialising in practice. Iran will also face the risk of write-offs of sovereign debt owed by Venezuela, estimated at approximately $1 billion owed to the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) as of August 2025. In addition, investments in joint ventures and diversified assets, valued by a former Iranian parliamentarian at more than $2 billion, are now vulnerable to seizure or freezing. This development represents a significant setback for Tehran, which for years had staked substantial expectations on the long-term returns of its partnership with the Maduro regime.

Collapse of Sanctions Evasion Mechanisms

The sanctions-evasion system linking Iran and Venezuela constituted a complex, multi-layered architecture developed over two decades, and its dismantling carries implications that extend well beyond the bilateral relationship. The so-called “shadow fleet” of oil tankers, used to conduct transfers between the two countries by deactivating tracking systems and falsifying documentation, is now facing intensified U.S. enforcement. The Trump administration has signalled an escalation in maritime interdiction operations, amid reports indicating that approximately 30 additional tankers in Venezuelan waters have become subject to sanctions and potential seizure.

At the financial level, Venezuela’s removal from the equation would result in the closure of a critical node within the broader sanctions-evasion architecture. Tehran had relied on financial triangulation mechanisms involving China and Venezuela, whereby frozen proceeds from Iranian oil sales to China were routed through Venezuela under the guise of loans, enabling Iran to access otherwise restricted financial resources. With the erosion of the state protection previously afforded by Venezuela, the shell companies and Lebanese-Venezuelan business networks that facilitated these transfers are now subject to heightened scrutiny and increased risk of U.S. legal action.

Strategically, the Venezuelan operation could establish a precedent that prompts the U.S. to broaden its targeting of Iran’s sanctions-evasion networks on a global scale. Analytical assessments suggest that successfully disrupting this pathway may encourage Washington to undermine the wider system that has enabled Iran to sustain oil exports estimated at between 1.5 and 2 million barrels per day. As a result, comparable arrangements established by Tehran in countries such as Syria and Lebanon, reliant on infrastructure projects and energy swaps to generate financial returns and extend influence, are now increasingly vulnerable to more stringent U.S. interventions and enforcement measures.

Military and Strategic Setback

The military repercussions of the collapse of the Venezuelan regime extend beyond the loss of IRGC positions and facilities, revealing structural vulnerabilities at the core of Iran’s security doctrine. The U.S. aerial penetration demonstrated the fragility of the multilayered Russian air-defence systems on which Tehran relies, such as the S-300, Buk-M2, and Pantsir, thereby deepening doubts within Iran’s military leadership regarding the effectiveness of its defensive arsenal, particularly in the wake of the failures recorded during the June 2025 confrontations.

Parallel to this technical exposure, the loss of Venezuela as an advanced operational base has effectively terminated Iran’s meaningful military presence in the Western Hemisphere. This has rendered the replacement of drone infrastructure and logistical support networks unfeasible and curtailed Tehran’s capacity to generate asymmetric threats to U.S. interests, sending a clear signal to Iran’s leadership that geographic distance and alliances do not confer immunity from U.S. military action.

At the geopolitical level, the ouster of Maduro represents the collapse of Tehran’s strategic pillar in the Americas. Caracas had provided both diplomatic cover and an economic partnership, and the anticipated inability of the remaining allies, Cuba and Nicaragua, to compensate for Venezuela’s economic and strategic weight underscores the comprehensive failure of a strategy predicated on leveraging sanctioned regimes to penetrate the United States’ immediate sphere of influence. From the U.S. perspective, by contrast, this shift constitutes a victory for the containment strategy: Washington has dismantled a key platform of influence for the IRGC and Hezbollah, depriving Tehran of a critical hub for sanctions evasion and a bargaining chip in the global balance of power.

This strategic shift compels Iran to redirect its focus toward the Middle East, Africa, and Asia following the exposure of its western flank. While some informal networks may persist, the loss of Venezuela has dissipated two decades of political investment, resulting in a contraction of Tehran’s geopolitical reach and the transformation of the Western Hemisphere into a hostile environment for Iranian influence. In effect, this development significantly curtails Iran’s ambitions to construct a global front opposing U.S. policies.

Failure of the “Pivot to the East” Strategy

In an effort to offset the erosion of its regional influence, Tehran intensified its pivot toward Russia and China, betting on economic, political, and military cover to counterbalance Western pressure. This orientation was formalised through Iran’s accession to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in 2023 and the BRICS group in 2024, alongside the signing of comprehensive strategic partnership agreements with China in 2021 and with Russia in January 2025.

However, the pivot to the East has failed to deliver the anticipated returns. Both Moscow and Beijing have refrained from providing the qualitative support Tehran sought, wary of direct confrontation with the U.S. This was evident during the June 2025 conflict with Israel and the U.S., when Russia’s response was limited to symbolic diplomatic backing, without meaningful military support or effective deterrence. Reports further suggested that Moscow may have withheld critical intelligence, underscoring the asymmetry inherent in the partnership.

China, for its part, has adopted an even more cautious posture. Despite remaining a principal importer of sanctioned Iranian oil, Beijing has avoided any steps that could expose it to U.S. secondary sanctions or entangle it in Iranian–American escalation. Notably, the partnership agreement with Tehran is ranked below those concluded with countries such as Pakistan, reflecting a deliberate Chinese intent to circumscribe its commitments.

Nor has Iran’s membership in BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation translated into practical mechanisms to ease sanctions or provide strategic backing, given the limited institutional capacity of both groupings, the divergence of member-state interests, and their lack of the financial cohesion required to offer viable alternatives to the Western-dominated financial system.

The Venezuelan crisis has starkly exposed the limits of Eastern support. Despite substantial Russian and Chinese interests in Caracas, particularly in the energy sector and sovereign debt, neither Russia nor China intervened to prevent regime change or to confront U.S. action. This posture of passive neutrality reinforces a growing assessment among observers that Moscow and Beijing view Tehran as a secondary tactical partner, leveraged as a pressure instrument against the West without any commitment to defend it in moments of existential crisis.

Iran will face sharply limited options for replacing Venezuela’s capabilities or compensating for their loss. Geographic and political constraints preclude the simple substitution of another Latin American partner, as no other country in the Western Hemisphere combines Venezuela’s adversarial posture toward the U.S. with a willingness to host an Iranian military presence, a sufficiently developed oil sector amenable to technical cooperation, and state structures permeable enough to facilitate the operations of Hezbollah’s criminal networks.

With respect to Cuba, despite ideological alignment and a history of cooperation with Iran, it lacks hydrocarbon resources and is mired in a severe economic crisis that limits its viability as a principal partner for Tehran. Nicaragua and Bolivia, both of which developed ties with Iran during the Chávez and Ahmadinejad eras, have since adopted more pragmatic postures and lack the strategic significance that Venezuela once offered. There is no realistic prospect that Iran can replicate the Venezuelan safe-haven model elsewhere in the Americas.

Alternative sanctions-evasion mechanisms are coming under increasingly stringent enforcement. The shadow-fleet strategy that sustained Iranian oil exports for years is now facing tougher interdiction measures, as U.S. authorities have signalled their readiness to seize vessels and to broaden targeting beyond Iranian-flagged ships to include any tankers facilitating sanctioned trade. Even as Chinese buyers continue to purchase Iranian crude, they are demanding steeper discounts to offset rising risks, thereby reducing the revenue Tehran can generate.

Cryptocurrencies and alternative financial technologies offer only partial workarounds and cannot fully substitute for state-protected infrastructure. Hezbollah’s documented shift toward stablecoins such as USDT provides only a limited capacity to sustain cross-border transfers. Yet, these mechanisms fall well short of the scale, security, and perceived legitimacy once afforded by Venezuelan state protection. Trade-based money laundering through the Tri-Border Area and West Africa continues, but it now faces heightened scrutiny and declining operational efficiency in the absence of Venezuelan institutional backing.

Growing Reliance on Russia and China

The loss of Venezuela further deepens Iran’s dependence on Russia and China at a moment when both powers have demonstrated only limited commitment to Tehran’s survival. Iran requires Russian military equipment to rebuild its air-defence capabilities damaged during the June 2025 conflict, access to Chinese markets to monetise sanctioned oil exports, and political cover from both powers to withstand mounting Western pressure.

Nevertheless, Russian capacity remains constrained by its commitments in Ukraine, while the Russian defence industry prioritises domestic requirements over export orders, even from paying customers such as Iran. Iran’s request for Su-35 fighter aircraft, despite advance payments, has been delayed due to difficulties Russian production lines have had in meeting surging wartime demand. Moreover, traditional Russian air-defence systems have proven ineffective against Israeli and U.S. capabilities, diminishing their value for Iran’s security needs.

China offers more advanced technology and greater economic capacity, yet it has shown even greater caution in deepening ties with Iran. Beijing is carefully calibrating its relationship with Tehran to avoid U.S. secondary sanctions or jeopardising its broader economic interests. The strategic partnership agreement is deliberately kept below the level of the “comprehensive” commitments China extends to close allies, and Beijing has shown no willingness to dilute sanctions through BRICS or other mechanisms that could provoke an American response.

The fundamental asymmetry remains intact: Iran views Russia and China as essential lifelines and strategic counterweights to the West, whereas Russia and China regard Iran as a useful but ultimately expendable partner. Neither Moscow nor Beijing has demonstrated a willingness to incur high costs to safeguard Iranian interests when those interests conflict with their own priorities.

The Collapse of Absolute Immunity

The arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has had immediate repercussions for Iran’s domestic political narrative, undermining the regime’s doctrine of absolute immunity. This was reflected in public reactions across several Iranian cities, where direct comparisons were drawn between the fall of the regime in Caracas and the potential future of Iran’s own system. The episode has further eroded the credibility of security deterrence, reinforcing a growing conviction that external alliances and military arsenals do not guarantee regime survival when sustained external pressure converges with deepening internal corruption.

The current situation increasingly revolves around the question of regime stability under unprecedented strain arising from the convergence of external failures and economic collapse. The loss of strategic effectiveness among key partners, Syria, Venezuela, and Hezbollah, alongside the damage sustained by nuclear infrastructure and the reimposition of sanctions, has produced a complex, multidimensional crisis.

Nevertheless, projections regarding the regime’s ultimate trajectory remain highly contingent, given its enduring resilience factors: a capacity for security mobilisation, cohesion within the ruling elite, the instrumentalisation of external threats to consolidate the domestic front, and the absence of a coherent, organised political alternative. The security establishment, particularly the IRGC, continues to retain sufficient organisational effectiveness to contain internal challenges, despite the severity of the economic downturn.

Conclusion

For Iran, the repercussions of Nicolás Maduro’s removal extend far beyond the loss of a distant ally. Venezuela had served as a critical anchor within the global sanctions-evasion system, sustaining Iranian oil exports, facilitating weapons transfers, providing financial infrastructure for Hezbollah’s operations, and projecting Iranian influence into the Western Hemisphere. The abrupt elimination of these capabilities compounds a cascading series of strategic setbacks that have progressively eroded Iran’s ability to project regional influence over the past 27 months.

For Iran, the immediate consequences include estimated losses of between USD 4.7 and 7.8 billion in investments, the disruption of oil-export mechanisms that had supported between 1.5 and 2 million barrels per day of sanctioned crude, the termination of its military presence in the Western Hemisphere, and the exposure of financial networks that had functioned as a lifeline under sanctions pressure. These losses unfold amid a severe domestic economic collapse marked by inflation estimated at 42–48%, a record depreciation of the national currency, and mass protests demanding regime change, together producing a “dual crisis” of external defeat and internal instability.

The broader strategic picture reveals an Iranian regional architecture in advanced stages of collapse. The so-called “Axis of Resistance,” into which Tehran invested decades of effort and tens of billions of dollars, proved hollow at a critical juncture. The loss of Syria severed the land corridor to Hezbollah and erased investments estimated at USD 30 billion. Hezbollah’s military defeat, in turn, exposed its vulnerability despite years of Iranian backing and investment. The loss of Venezuela eliminates a key platform for global sanctions evasion and brings Iran’s presence in the Western Hemisphere to an end. Neither Russia nor China has shown any willingness to provide comprehensive support capable of reversing these trajectories.

Accordingly, the Venezuelan crisis does not constitute an isolated incident, but rather a decisive blow within a sequence of developments that has fundamentally altered power dynamics in the Middle East. Iran’s four-decade project of regional dominance through proxy networks failed to generate strategic depth. Instead, it produced strategic exhaustion, draining resources that could have been directed toward domestic needs while creating structural vulnerabilities that adversaries systematically exploited. The convergence of external collapse and internal crisis confronting the Islamic Republic in January 2026 represents the most severe challenge the regime has faced since its founding, one for which no clear exit is yet apparent.

Buitrago, Deisy, and Vivian Sequera. “Iran, Venezuela Eye Trade Increase, Sign Petrochemical Deal.” Reuters, June 13, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/iranian-president-caracas-kicking-off-regional-tour-2023-06-12/.

Camacho, Pedro. “Leaked Documents Reveal Venezuela Funneled Oil Revenues into Iran’s Nuclear Program: Report.” Latin Times, December 16, 2025. https://www.latintimes.com/leaked-documents-reveal-venezuela-funneled-oil-revenues-irans-nuclear-program-report-592624.

Chotiner, Isaac. “The Maduro Regime Without Maduro.” The New Yorker, January 5, 2026. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-maduro-regime-without-maduro.

Clarke, Colin. “Hezbollah Is in Venezuela to Stay.” RAND, February 11, 2019. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2019/02/hezbollah-is-in-venezuela-to-stay.html.

Elia-Shalev, Asaf. “After Maduro’s Capture, Rubio Links Operation to Fight Against Iran and Hezbollah.” Times of Israel, January 6, 2026. https://www.timesofisrael.com/after-maduros-capture-rubio-links-operation-to-fight-against-iran-and-hezbollah/.

Froman, Michael. “On Regime Change in Venezuela.” Council on Foreign Relations, December 5, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/articles/regime-change-venezuela

Golshiri, Ghazal, and Madjid Zerrouky. “Venezuela: Iran Risks Losing a Key Economic and Military Ally.” Le Monde.Fr, January 7, 2026. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/01/07/venezuela-iran-risks-losing-a-key-economic-and-military-ally_6749155_4.html.

Harb, Ali. “US Issues Iran-Venezuela Sanctions Over Alleged Drone Trade.” Al Jazeera, December 30, 2025. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/30/us-issues-iran-venezuela-sanctions-over-alleged-drone-trade.

Humire, Joseph M. “The Maduro-Hezbollah Nexus: How Iran-backed Networks Prop up the Venezuelan Regime – Atlantic Council.” Atlantic Council, October 7, 2020. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/the-maduro-hezbollah-nexus-how-iran-backed-networks-prop-up-the-venezuelan-regime/.

Iran International. “US Sanctions 29 Vessels in Expanded Crackdown on Iran’s Shadow Oil Fleet,” December 18, 2025. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512186544.

Iran International. “US Senator Says Failing to Topple Venezuela’s Maduro Will Embolden Iran,” December 15, 2025. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512163852.

Iran International. “What the Fall of Maduro Means for Venezuela’s Vast Debt to Iran,” January 5, 2026. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601055479.

Javaid, Osama Bin. “Venezuela After Maduro: Oil, Power and the Limits of Intervention.” Al Jazeera, January 5, 2026. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/5/venezuela-after-maduro-oil-power-and-the-limits-of-intervention.

Jinsa-Shavdala. “The Cross-Continental Threat: Iran and Venezuela’s U.S.-Defying Partnership – JINSA.” JINSA, November 25, 2025. https://jinsa.org/the-cross-continental-threat-iran-and-venezuelas-us-defying-partnership/.

Kimer, James. “The Maduro-Hezbollah Nexus: How Iran-backed Networks Prop up the Venezuelan Regime – Atlantic Council.” Atlantic Council, October 7, 2020. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/the-maduro-hezbollah-nexus-how-iran-backed-networks-prop-up-the-venezuelan-regime/.

Nholas. “What’s Really Behind the Iran-Venezuela Bromance?” College of Social Sciences and Humanities, July 5, 2022. https://cssh.northeastern.edu/whats-really-behind-the-iran-venezuela-bromance/.

Shokri, Umud. “What Iran Stands to Lose After Maduro’s Downfall.” Iran International, January 6, 2026. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601066610.

Valencia, Jorge. “The Rise and Fall of Nicolás Maduro.” NPR, January 5, 2026. https://www.npr.org/2026/01/05/g-s1-104501/rise-and-fall-nicolas-maduro.